Rankings / Dogs / Hill's Science Plan

Hill's Science Plan

Medium Adult Optimal Care

Dogs · kibble · 12 kg

B

Overall score 72/100 · Good

Summary

Decent kibble. Chicken as 1st ingredient but cereals in 2nd and 3rd position. No problematic additives. AAFCO validated formula.

Sub-scores

B Proteins
B Nutrition balance
A Undesirables
C Transparency
A Species adaptability

Composition analysed

Dehydrated chicken (20%), corn, wheat, chicken fat, rice, beet pulp, flaxseed oil, vitamin E, L-carnitine, taurine

  1. A Dehydrated chicken 20% protein
  2. C Corn cereal
  3. C Wheat cereal
  4. A Chicken fat fat
  5. B Rice cereal
  6. B Beet pulp fiber
  7. A Flaxseed oil fat
  8. A Vitamin E vitamin mineral
  9. A L-carnitine beneficial additive
  10. A Taurine beneficial additive

Nutritional analysis

Crude protein
25%
Crude fat
15%
Ash
6.5%
Fibre
2%
Moisture
8%

Strengths

Weaknesses

Similar alternatives

PetFoodRate editorial review

Hill's Science Plan Medium Adult is the mainstream vet-recommended kibble that sits one tier above Royal Canin in our grading. At 72/100 (B grade), it gets the basics right: chicken as the first ingredient (not rice), no BHA/BHT, AAFCO validated formulation. The weak points are familiar to anyone who reads labels: corn and wheat in positions 2 and 3, limited transparency on fat sources, and a modest 25 percent protein level for a carnivore. Hill's invests heavily in clinical feeding trials (they publish more peer-reviewed studies than any other pet food brand), which gives their formulations a scientific credibility that composition alone does not. If your vet recommends Hill's over Royal Canin, they are making the better call. If your budget allows Acana or Wellness CORE, you are making a better one.

Compared to the competition

B Hill's Science Plan vs C Royal Canin Adult Medium

Hill's scores 14 points higher than Royal Canin (72 vs 58). Chicken first vs rice first. Better transparency. Same price range.

B Hill's Science Plan vs A Acana Wild Prairie Recipe

Acana scores 90/100 (A) vs Hill's 72/100 (B). The gap is the protein source: Acana uses 75% animal protein from 3+ named species vs Hill's 25% from one. Acana costs roughly 60% more.

Frequently asked questions

Hill's vs Royal Canin: which is better?

Hill's scores B (72/100) vs Royal Canin's C (58/100). Hill's has chicken first, Royal Canin has rice first. Hill's publishes more clinical data. For the same price bracket, Hill's is the objectively better mainstream choice.

STORIES · BRAND

See the brand on video

User reviews

Loading reviews...

Leave a review for this product

Your review will be verified before publication. No personal data is shared.